Critics rip into Susan Collins after abortion ruling by Justice Kavanaugh

Share

The Supreme Court is stopping Louisiana from enforcing new regulations on abortion clinics in a test of the conservative court's views on abortion rights.

In September, a panel of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 in favor of Act 620, the state's law requiring abortion centers to make arrangements for admitting women to hospitals within 30 miles in cases of life-threatening complications, and ordered a lawsuit against the law dismissed, reversing a previous ruling by a federal judge in Baton Rouge.

The Supreme Court has just handed down a pair of decisions that illustrate an important truth: Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr.is not, as many conservatives believe, some kind of traitor to their cause, an unreliable ally who will stab them in the back whenever he gets the chance.

Since the retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy last summer, Roberts has become the court's new swing vote. Only one of the doctors has admitting privileges at a nearby hospital.

DeGravelles further found that were the Louisiana law allowed to go into effect, only one clinic and one doctor in the state would be qualified to perform abortions.

At the lone abortion clinic operating in New Orleans, nurse Vanessa Shields-Haas, who helps escort patients into the facility, said she was pleasantly surprised at the 5-4 vote to block the state law's implementation. Which means he will nearly certainly vote to uphold the Louisiana law once the court hears it in full. But dissent signals Kavanaugh's openness to state restrictions on abortion rights with limitations and without overturning Roe v. Wade outright.

The four more conservative justices, including President Donald Trump's two recent appointments to the bench, would have let the law go into effect.

In a press release, Demand Justice said it is also running "static Facebook ads reminding Mainers of Collins' vote for Kavanaugh". If they could, then the law would not impose an undue burden on under Whole Women's Health v. Hellerstedt.

Kavanaugh said the doctors would continue to be allowed to perform abortions during the 45-day period and would be given leeway by regulators to comply with the law.

Sarri: Higuain keen to prove himself again
Real Madrid were 3-0 up at half-time when they replaced most of their starting line-up, including Cristiano Ronaldo. Real have been repeatedly linked with Hazard and he has made no secret of his desire to play for the Spanish club.

U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren enters 2020 presidential race
Warren insisted all along that she was not a member of a tribe and tribes alone determine those affiliations. Warren told the crowd on Saturday, "It won't be enough to just undo the awful acts of this administration".

How To Fix Apple's FaceTime Fustercluck
To update an iPhone or iPad, head to Settings General Software Update on your iPhone or iPad and install the update. Apple turned off the group-chat feature last week, after a 14-year-old boy in Tucson, Arizona, discovered the flaw .

In that decision, Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt, a five-member majority said the law "provides few, if any, health benefits for women, poses a substantial obstacle to women seeking abortions, and constitutes an "undue burden" on their constitutional right to do so".

"Louisiana legislators on both sides of the aisle enacted this law to protect women from the abortion lobby which repeatedly puts profit over health and safety standards, and has proven incapable of policing itself", she said in a statement.

Two days before the high court's action, David French - senior writer for National Review and former senior counsel for Alliance Defending Freedom - said a stay of the Fifth Circuit opinion by the justices would be "quite frankly ominous news for the pro-life movement".

Clark said if her critics weren't griping about Kavanaugh, they would be targeting Collins for something else. The law has been blocked since litigation began, so issuing the stay effectively changes nothing in terms of the immediate legal landscape.

Judge Patrick Higginbotham, a Reagan appointee like Smith, dissented, accusing his colleague of failing to "meaningfully apply" the Supreme Court's prior rulings on abortion.

At the same time, the threat to women's reproductive rights has pushed some liberal states to expand rights to abortion.

The law had been scheduled to take effect Monday, but Justice Samuel Alito delayed the effective date at least through Thursday to give the justices more time.

"We remain hopeful that if the Supreme Court grants certiorari in this case, it will be to re-affirm that courts rule in fact-specific cases; because the facts in our case show (the bill) is constitutional and consistent with our overall regulatory scheme for surgical procedures".

Share