The security breach was a bug that potentially gave developers access to personal profile information of more than half a million user accounts, though Google said it sound no evidence that any developers had abused the bug.
Some of that qualifies as legally protected personally identifiable information, and its exposure could trigger scrutiny from federal and state regulators, including some who have probed Google before on similar issues.
In the post, Google announced it was closing down the service after the Wall Street Journal revealed the company had known about the bug, which affected all Google+ users, since March this year.
Upon discovering the bug, Google patched it, but opted not to disclose it to the public out of fear of regulatory pressure and unfavorable comparisons to Facebook's Cambridge Analytica privacy scandal.
Google's attempt at a social network was never particularly popular - and became even less so when it admitted that 500,000 users may have had their data exposed. As for why it's being shut down, Google says that Google+ has "low usage and engagement", with 90 percent of G+ user sessions lasting less than five seconds. It also promises to provide consumers with more information, including options for downloading and migrating data, over the coming months. March was when a software bug was fixed that allowed third-party developers to access personal data.
Meanwhile, Google planned to add new workplace-oriented features to enhance the appeal of Google+ as a "secure corporate social network" to be used inside business operations.
Unconstitutional Stop and Frisk Will Save Chicago, Says Law and Order President
Whether it's law enforcement or military. "You'd be the first to know", he said, reports The Hill . Trump also heralded recent declines in unemployment as a positive step toward lower crime rates.
Skripal attack: Second Salisbury suspect 'decorated' officer
Both he and another man are wanted for attempted murder for a Novichok attack on Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia in March. The website said it discovered Mishkin's real identity after obtaining a scanned copy of his passport.
Valencia apologises for liking Instagram post calling for Mourinho to go
They have won and drawn their opening two Champions League games however, and look likely to advance from their group. Now we have to wait and see what response does Jose Mourinho come up with.
That fiasco had raised questions about the privacy practices of other big tech firms, including Google.
According to the Journal, Google's legal and policy team warned senior executives at the company that disclosing the security flaw could lead to "immediate regulatory interest".
"The review did highlight the significant challenges in creating and maintaining a successful Google+ that meets consumers' expectations", Ben Smith, vice president of engineering, wrote in a blog post.
To crack down on potential misuse data, Google will only allow third-party Gmail apps that directly involve email functionality, such as email clients, backup services, mail-merge services, and expense tracking.
Google+ launched with much fanfare in 2011, positioned as the search giant's answer to Facebook. "None of these thresholds were met in this instance", he said. Somehow, the intimate data of the first user would be included in the collection profile.